<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1145 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties in a tax case involving disallowances of expenses. The disallowances were based on differences of opinion, bona fide mistakes, and commercial expediency, not indicating concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of evidence for penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:25:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1145 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties in a tax case involving disallowances of expenses. The disallowances were based on differences of opinion, bona fide mistakes, and commercial expediency, not indicating concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of evidence for penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>