<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351263</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition to 6.5% of total purchases, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The CIT(A) justified the reopening of assessment under Section 147, citing substantial evidence against the genuineness of purchases. The ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s order well-reasoned and supported by legal precedents, affirming the 6.5% addition as fair and justified. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 25/10/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351263</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition to 6.5% of total purchases, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The CIT(A) justified the reopening of assessment under Section 147, citing substantial evidence against the genuineness of purchases. The ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s order well-reasoned and supported by legal precedents, affirming the 6.5% addition as fair and justified. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 25/10/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>