<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1135 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusion of adopting a profit rate of 5% of turnover. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach justifiable in cases of bogus purchases, emphasizing the need to estimate profit based on available facts. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal highlighting the necessity of estimation in cases involving inflated purchase prices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1135 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusion of adopting a profit rate of 5% of turnover. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach justifiable in cases of bogus purchases, emphasizing the need to estimate profit based on available facts. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal highlighting the necessity of estimation in cases involving inflated purchase prices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>