<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1120 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the show cause notice issued under Section 28 but set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority was directed to pass fresh orders after allowing cross-examination of witnesses and extending effective hearing to all appellants. Additional evidence may be admitted as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1120 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the show cause notice issued under Section 28 but set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority was directed to pass fresh orders after allowing cross-examination of witnesses and extending effective hearing to all appellants. Additional evidence may be admitted as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>