https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351238 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the redemption fine and penalty imposed on imported goods were not justified. The goods, described as old and used pipes, were found to be not liable for confiscation as there was no evidence of mis-declaration. The Tribunal rejected the Chartered Engineer's opinion on reusability due to lack of supporting documentation and market survey. Consequently, the redemption fine and penalty were deemed not imposable, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the appellant would not be subject to these penalties. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351238 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the redemption fine and penalty imposed on imported goods were not justified. The goods, described as old and used pipes, were found to be not liable for confiscation as there was no evidence of mis-declaration. The Tribunal rejected the Chartered Engineer's opinion on reusability due to lack of supporting documentation and market survey. Consequently, the redemption fine and penalty were deemed not imposable, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the appellant would not be subject to these penalties. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351238