<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1116 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to deficiencies in authorization for the notice of demand and non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation and adherence to procedural requirements in insolvency proceedings, following precedents set by the NCLAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1116 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to deficiencies in authorization for the notice of demand and non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation and adherence to procedural requirements in insolvency proceedings, following precedents set by the NCLAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>