https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351234 Cheques dishonoured for insufficiency of funds attracted the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments law, and the accused's admission of issuance, together with failure to reply to the demand notice, left that presumption unrebutted. The complainant's financial capacity and source of funds were accepted on the evidence, while the defence did not establish a probable version on the preponderance of probabilities. As the concurrent findings were not displaced by the material on record, no revisional interference was warranted and the conviction and sentence remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:23:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351234 Cheques dishonoured for insufficiency of funds attracted the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments law, and the accused's admission of issuance, together with failure to reply to the demand notice, left that presumption unrebutted. The complainant's financial capacity and source of funds were accepted on the evidence, while the defence did not establish a probable version on the preponderance of probabilities. As the concurrent findings were not displaced by the material on record, no revisional interference was warranted and the conviction and sentence remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351234