<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1110 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant institute&#039;s tax liability for providing convention services but revoked penalties due to the absence of intent to evade tax, limiting the demand to the normal period of limitation. The decision was made by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi on 25.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1110 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant institute&#039;s tax liability for providing convention services but revoked penalties due to the absence of intent to evade tax, limiting the demand to the normal period of limitation. The decision was made by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi on 25.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>