https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351215 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders due to defects in the stock verification process and lack of evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine activity. The Tribunal found no specific instance of attempted clandestine removal by the appellant, leading to the decision to grant consequential benefits to the appellants in accordance with the law. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351215 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders due to defects in the stock verification process and lack of evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine activity. The Tribunal found no specific instance of attempted clandestine removal by the appellant, leading to the decision to grant consequential benefits to the appellants in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351215