<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1269 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of companies with turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the list of comparables, emphasizing the importance of turnover filters. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to include previously rejected companies if they met the filters. The Tribunal dismissed issues regarding interest cost exclusion and risk adjustments as not pressed. It upheld the application of appropriate filters for selecting comparables and directed the AO to rectify the inclusion/exclusion of certain companies under section 154. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for consistent and appropriate filters in benchmarking international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1269 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of companies with turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the list of comparables, emphasizing the importance of turnover filters. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to include previously rejected companies if they met the filters. The Tribunal dismissed issues regarding interest cost exclusion and risk adjustments as not pressed. It upheld the application of appropriate filters for selecting comparables and directed the AO to rectify the inclusion/exclusion of certain companies under section 154. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for consistent and appropriate filters in benchmarking international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>