<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1334 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196212</link>
    <description>While computing the section 10A deduction, expenses excluded from export turnover for telecommunication and foreign currency items must also be excluded from total turnover, so the proportionate formula remains consistent; the assessee therefore succeeded on that point. A disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for alleged non-deduction of tax at source on reimbursements to a foreign associated enterprise was treated as only increasing the undertaking&#039;s profits, and those enhanced profits were held to remain eligible for section 10A deduction because the statute contains no contrary exclusion. The revenue&#039;s appeal failed and the relief granted to the assessee was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1334 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196212</link>
      <description>While computing the section 10A deduction, expenses excluded from export turnover for telecommunication and foreign currency items must also be excluded from total turnover, so the proportionate formula remains consistent; the assessee therefore succeeded on that point. A disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for alleged non-deduction of tax at source on reimbursements to a foreign associated enterprise was treated as only increasing the undertaking&#039;s profits, and those enhanced profits were held to remain eligible for section 10A deduction because the statute contains no contrary exclusion. The revenue&#039;s appeal failed and the relief granted to the assessee was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>