<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1735 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196213</link>
    <description>Completed assessments under section 153A cannot be disturbed in the absence of incriminating material found during search, so additions for the completed year were not sustainable. Amounts received through banking channels from the assessee&#039;s father were not taxable as unexplained income once the donor&#039;s identity, the genuineness of the transaction, and the immediate source were established; the assessee was not required to prove the source of the source. Jewellery found during search was also not liable to addition as unexplained where reconciliation, supported by records and valuation material, showed that declared jewellery exceeded the jewellery found and the Revenue did not rebut it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1735 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196213</link>
      <description>Completed assessments under section 153A cannot be disturbed in the absence of incriminating material found during search, so additions for the completed year were not sustainable. Amounts received through banking channels from the assessee&#039;s father were not taxable as unexplained income once the donor&#039;s identity, the genuineness of the transaction, and the immediate source were established; the assessee was not required to prove the source of the source. Jewellery found during search was also not liable to addition as unexplained where reconciliation, supported by records and valuation material, showed that declared jewellery exceeded the jewellery found and the Revenue did not rebut it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>