<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 529 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196191</link>
    <description>Seniori ty in service matters can confer locus standi where an employee&#039;s continued service would directly affect another officer&#039;s rights, and the Tribunal has jurisdiction over such disputes under the Administrative Tribunals Act. The Supreme Court also held that a notice of voluntary retirement under the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules becomes operative on acceptance by the Government of India; once accepted and the service relationship is severed, a later withdrawal cannot revive service. On that basis, the withdrawal request was ineffective, the respondent had ceased in service from May 1993, and no further pay or consequential benefits were due.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 529 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196191</link>
      <description>Seniori ty in service matters can confer locus standi where an employee&#039;s continued service would directly affect another officer&#039;s rights, and the Tribunal has jurisdiction over such disputes under the Administrative Tribunals Act. The Supreme Court also held that a notice of voluntary retirement under the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules becomes operative on acceptance by the Government of India; once accepted and the service relationship is severed, a later withdrawal cannot revive service. On that basis, the withdrawal request was ineffective, the respondent had ceased in service from May 1993, and no further pay or consequential benefits were due.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>