<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 680 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196183</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the software expenditure to be treated as revenue rather than capital expenditure. Additionally, the court held that the loss from the non-STP unit should be set off against profits of the STP unit after excluding profits under section 10A, contrary to the approach taken by the assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 680 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196183</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the software expenditure to be treated as revenue rather than capital expenditure. Additionally, the court held that the loss from the non-STP unit should be set off against profits of the STP unit after excluding profits under section 10A, contrary to the approach taken by the assessing officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>