https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196178 The Court allowed the writ application challenging the demand for interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It held that the Writ Court can entertain such challenges even if alternative remedies exist. The Court found the demand for interest to be without jurisdiction as it was based on an earlier order that had been set aside. It emphasized the importance of upholding legal rights and proper interpretation of statutory provisions. The Court set aside the demand, ordered refunds, and disposed of the writ application without costs. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:18:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196178 The Court allowed the writ application challenging the demand for interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It held that the Writ Court can entertain such challenges even if alternative remedies exist. The Court found the demand for interest to be without jurisdiction as it was based on an earlier order that had been set aside. It emphasized the importance of upholding legal rights and proper interpretation of statutory provisions. The Court set aside the demand, ordered refunds, and disposed of the writ application without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196178