<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1071 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The addition of Rs. 11,10,000/- for the gold brick was sustained due to lack of evidence. The deletion of Rs. 23.86 lakhs and Rs. 8.25 lakhs for marriage expenses was upheld. The addition of Rs. 30 lakhs for advance against land was reinstated, while the deletion of Rs. 41,52,255/- for cash creditors was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:11:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1071 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The addition of Rs. 11,10,000/- for the gold brick was sustained due to lack of evidence. The deletion of Rs. 23.86 lakhs and Rs. 8.25 lakhs for marriage expenses was upheld. The addition of Rs. 30 lakhs for advance against land was reinstated, while the deletion of Rs. 41,52,255/- for cash creditors was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>