<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 80 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10688</link>
    <description>Delayed deposit of tax deducted at source can complete the offence under section 276B without requiring proof of mens rea. However, departmental prosecution instructions require discretion where the default is not substantial and the tax has already been deposited. Where payment preceded consideration of prosecution, the delay was not substantial, and the amount involved was not large, prosecution should not ordinarily proceed. The conviction was quashed and the applicant was acquitted because the authorities failed to apply the governing instructions and remand would serve no useful purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 80 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10688</link>
      <description>Delayed deposit of tax deducted at source can complete the offence under section 276B without requiring proof of mens rea. However, departmental prosecution instructions require discretion where the default is not substantial and the tax has already been deposited. Where payment preceded consideration of prosecution, the delay was not substantial, and the amount involved was not large, prosecution should not ordinarily proceed. The conviction was quashed and the applicant was acquitted because the authorities failed to apply the governing instructions and remand would serve no useful purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>