<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1054 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of additions related to on-money cash payments for property purchase and the taxability of dividend income under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the requirement for corroborative evidence to support such additions and clarified that deemed dividend can only be taxed in the hands of shareholders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1054 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of additions related to on-money cash payments for property purchase and the taxability of dividend income under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the requirement for corroborative evidence to support such additions and clarified that deemed dividend can only be taxed in the hands of shareholders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>