<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1046 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351167</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) reduced the penalty imposed under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962, from Rs. 29,82,729 to Rs. 1 lakh each for the parties involved in a case concerning a discrepancy in an export consignment. The Tribunal considered the voluntary disclosure of the error and lack of intentional suppression, leading to a justified reduction in the penalty amount. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent and dismissing the appeal for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1046 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351167</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) reduced the penalty imposed under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962, from Rs. 29,82,729 to Rs. 1 lakh each for the parties involved in a case concerning a discrepancy in an export consignment. The Tribunal considered the voluntary disclosure of the error and lack of intentional suppression, leading to a justified reduction in the penalty amount. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent and dismissing the appeal for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>