<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1302 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196165</link>
    <description>Inherent powers permit a Company Court to recall an order confirming an auction where a material valuation factor, including development potential and likely FSI changes, was overlooked and the accepted bid was grossly inadequate. The recall and fresh-auction direction were upheld to protect the company&#039;s assets and secure the best market price. An impleadment application cannot be rejected merely by referring to an earlier rejected joining request without deciding whether the applicant is a necessary or proper party. The dismissal required fresh consideration on merits, while the auction re-sale direction remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:40:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1302 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196165</link>
      <description>Inherent powers permit a Company Court to recall an order confirming an auction where a material valuation factor, including development potential and likely FSI changes, was overlooked and the accepted bid was grossly inadequate. The recall and fresh-auction direction were upheld to protect the company&#039;s assets and secure the best market price. An impleadment application cannot be rejected merely by referring to an earlier rejected joining request without deciding whether the applicant is a necessary or proper party. The dismissal required fresh consideration on merits, while the auction re-sale direction remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>