<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1144 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196166</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the petition and granted the stay, appointing a provisional liquidator. The respondent company was directed to provide various financial documents and information, and was restrained from alienating its immovable properties. The case was scheduled for the next hearing to proceed with the matter efficiently, emphasizing transparency and fairness in the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:40:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1144 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196166</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the petition and granted the stay, appointing a provisional liquidator. The respondent company was directed to provide various financial documents and information, and was restrained from alienating its immovable properties. The case was scheduled for the next hearing to proceed with the matter efficiently, emphasizing transparency and fairness in the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>