<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1313 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficient own funds compared to investments, justifying the deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii). Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the voluntary disallowance of administrative expenses by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:40:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1313 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficient own funds compared to investments, justifying the deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii). Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the voluntary disallowance of administrative expenses by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>