<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196153</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders settling the duty liability for 11 shipments at Rs. 21,35,879/- instead of the disclosed Rs. 6 lakhs. The Court emphasized the necessity of applying Rule 5(3) of the Customs Valuation Rules, which requires using the lowest transaction value for identical goods. The petition was allowed, ruling in favor of the petitioner without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196153</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders settling the duty liability for 11 shipments at Rs. 21,35,879/- instead of the disclosed Rs. 6 lakhs. The Court emphasized the necessity of applying Rule 5(3) of the Customs Valuation Rules, which requires using the lowest transaction value for identical goods. The petition was allowed, ruling in favor of the petitioner without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>