<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 79 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10680</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the lack of mens rea and the unforeseeable nature of the additions made under section 41(1) at the time of filing the advance tax estimates. The Court held that the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were unwarranted, and the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 79 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10680</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the lack of mens rea and the unforeseeable nature of the additions made under section 41(1) at the time of filing the advance tax estimates. The Court held that the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were unwarranted, and the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>