<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 77 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10674</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the generator used for manufacturing or production purposes qualifies for investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;business of manufacture&quot; or &quot;production&quot; to include machinery used for manufacturing any article. The investment allowance was deemed admissible, overturning the Revenue&#039;s disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 77 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10674</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the generator used for manufacturing or production purposes qualifies for investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;business of manufacture&quot; or &quot;production&quot; to include machinery used for manufacturing any article. The investment allowance was deemed admissible, overturning the Revenue&#039;s disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>