<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 54 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10672</link>
    <description>HC held that a provision for future warranty expenses arising from a contractual warranty clause is not a contingent liability but an accrued business liability for the accounting year. Although actual payment may be deferred, where accounts are maintained on the mercantile system the liability is sufficiently definite and, consistent with commercial and accounting principles, is allowable as a deduction under section 37 when computing business profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 54 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10672</link>
      <description>HC held that a provision for future warranty expenses arising from a contractual warranty clause is not a contingent liability but an accrued business liability for the accounting year. Although actual payment may be deferred, where accounts are maintained on the mercantile system the liability is sufficiently definite and, consistent with commercial and accounting principles, is allowable as a deduction under section 37 when computing business profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>