https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196143 A departmental enquiry is not vitiated by refusal to permit foreign travel or by alleged non-supply of documents where repeated opportunities were given, available material was supplied, witnesses were examined, and no real prejudice was shown. Allegations of bias failed because no credible evidence established personal hostility, adverse interest, or a real likelihood of bias; prior administrative opinion that enquiry was required did not by itself taint the proceedings. The employee had no absolute right to a professional lawyer or a particular railway officer where the rules did not confer such entitlement and the charges were not technically complex. The dismissal from service was therefore upheld. en-us Wed, 14 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:31:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196143 A departmental enquiry is not vitiated by refusal to permit foreign travel or by alleged non-supply of documents where repeated opportunities were given, available material was supplied, witnesses were examined, and no real prejudice was shown. Allegations of bias failed because no credible evidence established personal hostility, adverse interest, or a real likelihood of bias; prior administrative opinion that enquiry was required did not by itself taint the proceedings. The employee had no absolute right to a professional lawyer or a particular railway officer where the rules did not confer such entitlement and the charges were not technically complex. The dismissal from service was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196143