<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196141</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies only to the personal search of an accused and not to a bag, briefcase, attache case or other container carried by that person. The Court held that the phrase &quot;search any person&quot; bears its plain meaning and does not extend to articles merely carried on the body, and the broader statutory definitions did not justify enlargement of that protection. Accordingly, non-compliance with Section 50 could not by itself sustain the acquittal where the recovery was from a container, and the acquittal was set aside to that extent for reconsideration of the remaining grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196141</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies only to the personal search of an accused and not to a bag, briefcase, attache case or other container carried by that person. The Court held that the phrase &quot;search any person&quot; bears its plain meaning and does not extend to articles merely carried on the body, and the broader statutory definitions did not justify enlargement of that protection. Accordingly, non-compliance with Section 50 could not by itself sustain the acquittal where the recovery was from a container, and the acquittal was set aside to that extent for reconsideration of the remaining grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>