<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 21 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10668</link>
    <description>The court directed the firm petitioner to include a partner in the challenge to the notice under section 158BD of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s requirement to provide reasons for satisfaction and allow objections. The court instructed compliance with timelines for filing returns under section 158BC and left the determination of the block assessment period to the Assessing Officer. The petition was disposed of, allowing further proceedings based on the court&#039;s directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 21 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10668</link>
      <description>The court directed the firm petitioner to include a partner in the challenge to the notice under section 158BD of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s requirement to provide reasons for satisfaction and allow objections. The court instructed compliance with timelines for filing returns under section 158BC and left the determination of the block assessment period to the Assessing Officer. The petition was disposed of, allowing further proceedings based on the court&#039;s directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>