https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196135 A litigant seeking writ relief under Article 226 must approach the court with clean hands, and suppression of a material fact can bar exercise of equitable, discretionary jurisdiction. Here, the petitioner failed to disclose that a Section 17(1) SARFAESI application had already been filed before the Debts Recovery Tribunal before the writ petition was instituted. The declaration that no other proceeding was pending and no other remedy was available was found incorrect, so writ relief was denied and the petition was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:23:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196135 A litigant seeking writ relief under Article 226 must approach the court with clean hands, and suppression of a material fact can bar exercise of equitable, discretionary jurisdiction. Here, the petitioner failed to disclose that a Section 17(1) SARFAESI application had already been filed before the Debts Recovery Tribunal before the writ petition was instituted. The declaration that no other proceeding was pending and no other remedy was available was found incorrect, so writ relief was denied and the petition was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196135