https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196132 Bail pending appeal under the NDPS Act requires satisfaction of Section 37 restrictions, but the Court found sufficient doubt in the prosecution case to justify release. It noted the discrepancy between the number of packets loaded and unloaded, the absence of any inquiry by railway authorities into that discrepancy, and that no railway officer was arraigned despite being present at loading. The Court also observed no material showing prior criminal antecedents, reducing apprehension of repeat offending. On those factors, the appellant was entitled to bail subject to bond and sureties. en-us Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:18:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196132 Bail pending appeal under the NDPS Act requires satisfaction of Section 37 restrictions, but the Court found sufficient doubt in the prosecution case to justify release. It noted the discrepancy between the number of packets loaded and unloaded, the absence of any inquiry by railway authorities into that discrepancy, and that no railway officer was arraigned despite being present at loading. The Court also observed no material showing prior criminal antecedents, reducing apprehension of repeat offending. On those factors, the appellant was entitled to bail subject to bond and sureties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196132