<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1108 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196129</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the special leave petitions were dismissed in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Union of India. The order reflects that the present central excise challenge was covered by that precedent, leaving no separate issue for interference. The dismissal therefore follows the same legal position already settled by the Court on the point in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1108 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196129</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the special leave petitions were dismissed in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Union of India. The order reflects that the present central excise challenge was covered by that precedent, leaving no separate issue for interference. The dismissal therefore follows the same legal position already settled by the Court on the point in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>