https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196119 A disputed and belated claim for reward under a government scheme could not be pursued in writ jurisdiction where entitlement depended on contested facts and no enforceable legal right was shown. The respondents denied that the claimant had supplied the information or that the investigation was booked on that basis, so the claim required factual determination beyond Article 226 proceedings. The court also treated the delay as material. In the absence of a clear legal right to the reward, writ relief was unavailable and the reward claim was rejected. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:36:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196119 A disputed and belated claim for reward under a government scheme could not be pursued in writ jurisdiction where entitlement depended on contested facts and no enforceable legal right was shown. The respondents denied that the claimant had supplied the information or that the investigation was booked on that basis, so the claim required factual determination beyond Article 226 proceedings. The court also treated the delay as material. In the absence of a clear legal right to the reward, writ relief was unavailable and the reward claim was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196119