https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351153 Seizure of goods and vehicle was upheld as a detention matter arising from an expired e-way bill and alleged irregularities on physical verification, but the Court found disputed facts regarding the goods and supporting documents and noted that properly documented goods had already been released. As penalty proceedings were pending and the penalty order was separately appealable, the Court directed release of the seized goods and vehicle on payment of the tax amount mentioned in the show cause notice. It also directed the appellate authority to decide any appeal expeditiously without insisting on deposit of the penalty amount at the stage of hearing or admission. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351153 Seizure of goods and vehicle was upheld as a detention matter arising from an expired e-way bill and alleged irregularities on physical verification, but the Court found disputed facts regarding the goods and supporting documents and noted that properly documented goods had already been released. As penalty proceedings were pending and the penalty order was separately appealable, the Court directed release of the seized goods and vehicle on payment of the tax amount mentioned in the show cause notice. It also directed the appellate authority to decide any appeal expeditiously without insisting on deposit of the penalty amount at the stage of hearing or admission. Case-Laws GST Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351153