<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1031 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351152</link>
    <description>Madras HC held that an assessment based on alleged bill-trader dealings could not be sustained where it amounted to reopening a concluded assessment without new material. The Court applied its earlier ruling on identical facts and held that the statutory power under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 had to be exercised within the prescribed time limit. Proceedings initiated beyond that limit were without jurisdiction and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1031 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351152</link>
      <description>Madras HC held that an assessment based on alleged bill-trader dealings could not be sustained where it amounted to reopening a concluded assessment without new material. The Court applied its earlier ruling on identical facts and held that the statutory power under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 had to be exercised within the prescribed time limit. Proceedings initiated beyond that limit were without jurisdiction and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>