https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351139 In writ jurisdiction, the Court considered serious allegations that departmental officers had removed records from the assessee's premises and that audit proceedings remained incomplete without a final report. Because no reply was filed and the allegations were grave, it directed production of the complete departmental record, ordered a vigilance inquiry into the survey, search and audit operations, and required an affidavit explaining the consequences of not issuing a final audit report and the corrective steps contemplated under the applicable circular. The directions also required an explanation for any non-production of the seized or removed files. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351139 In writ jurisdiction, the Court considered serious allegations that departmental officers had removed records from the assessee's premises and that audit proceedings remained incomplete without a final report. Because no reply was filed and the allegations were grave, it directed production of the complete departmental record, ordered a vigilance inquiry into the survey, search and audit operations, and required an affidavit explaining the consequences of not issuing a final audit report and the corrective steps contemplated under the applicable circular. The directions also required an explanation for any non-production of the seized or removed files. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351139