https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351117 The Appeals were dismissed, and the demand for recovery of CENVAT credit was confirmed with interest and penalty. The Appellant's failure to provide concrete evidence of dealer existence and genuine credit availing led to the rejection of their arguments. Despite claiming dealer existence from the start, the Appellant could not substantiate it with reliable evidence. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decisions, emphasizing the necessity of credible evidence in tax-related matters to avoid adverse legal consequences. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351117 The Appeals were dismissed, and the demand for recovery of CENVAT credit was confirmed with interest and penalty. The Appellant's failure to provide concrete evidence of dealer existence and genuine credit availing led to the rejection of their arguments. Despite claiming dealer existence from the start, the Appellant could not substantiate it with reliable evidence. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decisions, emphasizing the necessity of credible evidence in tax-related matters to avoid adverse legal consequences. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351117