https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351094 Imported goods were classified by reference to their inherent character, technical literature, and the competing tariff entries. The specific tariff heading prevails over a more general description, and the claimed digital display function did not alter the goods' essential nature as apparatus falling under Chapter 90. On that basis, the goods were held to be correctly classifiable under Heading 9022 19 00 as apparatus based on the use of X-rays, rather than under Heading 8471 41 90 as automatic data processing machines or units thereof. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:24:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351094 Imported goods were classified by reference to their inherent character, technical literature, and the competing tariff entries. The specific tariff heading prevails over a more general description, and the claimed digital display function did not alter the goods' essential nature as apparatus falling under Chapter 90. On that basis, the goods were held to be correctly classifiable under Heading 9022 19 00 as apparatus based on the use of X-rays, rather than under Heading 8471 41 90 as automatic data processing machines or units thereof. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351094