<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 972 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, for the confiscation of Red Sanders Wood, as there was no evidence demonstrating intent to export goods improperly. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty of Rs. 21,12,000/- was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:24:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 972 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, for the confiscation of Red Sanders Wood, as there was no evidence demonstrating intent to export goods improperly. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty of Rs. 21,12,000/- was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>