https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196092 The High Court ruled in favor of the applicant, a government company, in a case involving the transfer and disposal of criminal cases filed by the Ex-Managing Director of a company in liquidation. The Court held that post-winding up, only the Official Liquidator has the authority to prosecute or defend legal proceedings on behalf of the company. It was determined that the Metropolitan Magistrate lacked jurisdiction in these matters, and the complaints were ordered to be transferred to the High Court for proper adjudication by the Official Liquidator. The Court emphasized the exclusive authority of the Official Liquidator in representing the company in liquidation. en-us Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:35:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196092 The High Court ruled in favor of the applicant, a government company, in a case involving the transfer and disposal of criminal cases filed by the Ex-Managing Director of a company in liquidation. The Court held that post-winding up, only the Official Liquidator has the authority to prosecute or defend legal proceedings on behalf of the company. It was determined that the Metropolitan Magistrate lacked jurisdiction in these matters, and the complaints were ordered to be transferred to the High Court for proper adjudication by the Official Liquidator. The Court emphasized the exclusive authority of the Official Liquidator in representing the company in liquidation. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196092