<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 652 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196091</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the complaint related to the significant amount cheque, while permitting subsequent complaints arising from multiple cheques to continue independently. The judgment clarified the legal implications of entering into agreements during Section 138 proceedings and the significance of fresh causes of action for dishonored cheques issued as part of such agreements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 652 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196091</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the complaint related to the significant amount cheque, while permitting subsequent complaints arising from multiple cheques to continue independently. The judgment clarified the legal implications of entering into agreements during Section 138 proceedings and the significance of fresh causes of action for dishonored cheques issued as part of such agreements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>