<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 966 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351087</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of interest accrued on sticky loans and advances, citing previous judicial precedents and case laws in favor of the Assessee. The ITAT emphasized the importance of adhering to the mercantile system of accounting and reasonable certainty in recognizing income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 966 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351087</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of interest accrued on sticky loans and advances, citing previous judicial precedents and case laws in favor of the Assessee. The ITAT emphasized the importance of adhering to the mercantile system of accounting and reasonable certainty in recognizing income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>