<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) in disallowing the loss on the sale of shares, adding unexplained cash credits under Section 68, and disallowing expenses under Section 14A. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not establish the genuineness of transactions and the identity and creditworthiness of parties involved, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) in disallowing the loss on the sale of shares, adding unexplained cash credits under Section 68, and disallowing expenses under Section 14A. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not establish the genuineness of transactions and the identity and creditworthiness of parties involved, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>