<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 71 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10646</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found. It clarified that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could only be imposed if tax evasion occurred due to inaccurate particulars of income. Since no tax evasion or concealment was established in this case, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the significance of accurate financial reporting to avoid penalties under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 71 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10646</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found. It clarified that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could only be imposed if tax evasion occurred due to inaccurate particulars of income. Since no tax evasion or concealment was established in this case, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the significance of accurate financial reporting to avoid penalties under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>