<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 949 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351070</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming duty enhancement due to non-inclusion of conversion cost in declared value, violation of import licensing conditions, undervaluation, and imposition of redemption fine and penalty. The judgment stressed the importance of imposing appropriate fines and penalties in cases of misdeclarations to deter evasion, leaving the determination of specific amounts to the Chief Commissioner of Customs for consistent enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 949 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351070</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming duty enhancement due to non-inclusion of conversion cost in declared value, violation of import licensing conditions, undervaluation, and imposition of redemption fine and penalty. The judgment stressed the importance of imposing appropriate fines and penalties in cases of misdeclarations to deter evasion, leaving the determination of specific amounts to the Chief Commissioner of Customs for consistent enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>