https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351062 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in a dispute over service tax liability on construction, erection, and commissioning contracts. The Tribunal found that the Revenue's approach of categorizing all contracts under "Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services" was not sustainable. It held that the liability would only arise from 1.6.2007 if the contracts were considered works contracts and that denial of the composition scheme required further examination. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders, remanding the matter for a fresh decision, allowing the appellant an opportunity to present their case. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351062 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in a dispute over service tax liability on construction, erection, and commissioning contracts. The Tribunal found that the Revenue's approach of categorizing all contracts under "Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services" was not sustainable. It held that the liability would only arise from 1.6.2007 if the contracts were considered works contracts and that denial of the composition scheme required further examination. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders, remanding the matter for a fresh decision, allowing the appellant an opportunity to present their case. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351062