https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351056 Cenvat credit on steel inputs was disputed because the invoices described the goods as CRC or CR sheets while the goods received and recorded were HR or HRC sheets. The Members took differing views on whether this discrepancy justified denial of credit and, because no consensus was reached, directed that the matter be placed before the Hon'ble President for reference to a third Member. The order does not finally decide the admissibility of credit on the merits. en-us Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:05:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351056 Cenvat credit on steel inputs was disputed because the invoices described the goods as CRC or CR sheets while the goods received and recorded were HR or HRC sheets. The Members took differing views on whether this discrepancy justified denial of credit and, because no consensus was reached, directed that the matter be placed before the Hon'ble President for reference to a third Member. The order does not finally decide the admissibility of credit on the merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351056