<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 73 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10642</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee cannot be taxed under Section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act for profits from machinery previously depreciated by a dissolved partnership firm. The court emphasized that the firm and its partners are not distinct entities, and therefore, the assessee should not be liable for the depreciation benefit claimed by the firm. The decision favored the assessee, ruling against the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 73 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10642</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee cannot be taxed under Section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act for profits from machinery previously depreciated by a dissolved partnership firm. The court emphasized that the firm and its partners are not distinct entities, and therefore, the assessee should not be liable for the depreciation benefit claimed by the firm. The decision favored the assessee, ruling against the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>