https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196072 The court found in favor of the petitioners, a company and its director, in a dispute over the mode of payment for Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) in a civil construction tender process issued by Botad Municipality. The court ruled that the petitioners' submission of Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) instead of Demand Draft (DD) for EMD payment was a minor deviation caused by the municipality's oversight, not intentional non-compliance. The court ordered the Municipality to consider the petitioners qualified for the tender process, allowing them to proceed with their financial bids alongside other qualified contractors. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:10:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196072 The court found in favor of the petitioners, a company and its director, in a dispute over the mode of payment for Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) in a civil construction tender process issued by Botad Municipality. The court ruled that the petitioners' submission of Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) instead of Demand Draft (DD) for EMD payment was a minor deviation caused by the municipality's oversight, not intentional non-compliance. The court ordered the Municipality to consider the petitioners qualified for the tender process, allowing them to proceed with their financial bids alongside other qualified contractors. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196072