<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196074</link>
    <description>The Tax Case Appeal was dismissed as not pressed due to not meeting the revised monetary limits outlined in Circular No.21 of 2015. Despite no formal withdrawal instructions, the Court enforced the Circular under Section 268-A(i) of the Income Tax Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision aligned with the Circular&#039;s aim to reduce unproductive litigations, leaving the legal issues raised in the appeal open for potential future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196074</link>
      <description>The Tax Case Appeal was dismissed as not pressed due to not meeting the revised monetary limits outlined in Circular No.21 of 2015. Despite no formal withdrawal instructions, the Court enforced the Circular under Section 268-A(i) of the Income Tax Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision aligned with the Circular&#039;s aim to reduce unproductive litigations, leaving the legal issues raised in the appeal open for potential future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>